How questions repeat across the publicly observable PMQ question universe.
Method: exact (normalised-text equality) → near (≥0.97 similarity) → structural (≥0.88 + shared syllabus) → conceptual (≥0.70 + shared syllabus + shared family + keyword overlap). Raw frequency and independent-source frequency are reported separately (per spec §24).
06_NORMALISED_CORPUS/duplicate_groups.json).| Group | Type | Sources | Underlying question |
|---|---|---|---|
| DG_0033 | exact | SRC_0001, SRC_0002 (official SP1+SP2) | "…HR platform resource planning — which consideration is not critical?" |
| DG_0035 | near | SRC_0001, SRC_0010 (official + Wellingtone) | Wind-farm stakeholder-expectations long question |
| DG_0080–0095 | exact/near/structural | SRC_0004 + SRC_0005 (BoK7 official + QA) | All 16 old-format questions (QA answered the official paper) |
| DG_0081 | conceptual | SRC_0004, SRC_0005, SRC_0006 (+3 indep) | Functional vs matrix organisational structure |
| DG_0107 | structural | SRC_0011, SRC_0015 (Parallel + PMW) | Advantages of effective configuration management |
Verbatim-identical questions across storefronts indicate a single circulating practice bank, not independent evidence:
⇒ For these, independent_source_count = 1, regardless of how many storefronts host them.
Quoted or implied by multiple independent old-format sources (PMW, Parallel, QA, BoK7):
project management plan components; configuration management advantages; risk management process steps; projects vs BAU; functional vs matrix; sponsor responsibilities; team development stages; EVM advantages/disadvantages; business case content; procurement strategy contents.
Only one exact within-exam repeat is observable (SP1 Q33 = SP2 Q14) — both official papers are independent constructions, so this is the strongest public evidence that question reuse (not just topic reuse) occurs between sittings/versions. All other current-format recurrence is conceptual (e.g. re-estimation: SP1 Q18 ↔ SP2 Q12; sustainability reporting: SP1 Q4 ↔ SP2 Q6).
independent_source_count for any probability modelling, and never treat a Tier-5 question's multiple storefronts as multiple occurrences.